Bug 1128229 - Add more fuzz on Win8. a=testonly
authorRyan VanderMeulen <ryanvm@gmail.com>
Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:00:50 -0500
changeset 249706 8e744fc8972c51939a7be0f702988c31d2e6465f
parent 249705 12dde0274d487fd298921123c1b15be01c824e8d
child 249707 0eabce4d5b3cc2e4fb62a660d72f63cc06e6d1e2
push id4489
push userraliiev@mozilla.com
push dateMon, 23 Feb 2015 15:17:55 +0000
treeherdermozilla-beta@fd7c3dc24146 [default view] [failures only]
perfherder[talos] [build metrics] [platform microbench] (compared to previous push)
reviewerstestonly
bugs1128229
milestone37.0a2
Bug 1128229 - Add more fuzz on Win8. a=testonly DONTBUILD CLOSED TREE
layout/reftests/bugs/reftest.list
layout/reftests/image/reftest.list
--- a/layout/reftests/bugs/reftest.list
+++ b/layout/reftests/bugs/reftest.list
@@ -933,17 +933,17 @@ fuzzy-if(Android,13,9) == 407111-1.html 
 == 409084-1a.html 409084-1-ref.html
 == 409084-1b.html 409084-1-ref.html
 == 409089-1.html 409089-1-ref.html
 == 409089-2.html 409089-2-ref.html
 == 409089-3.html 409089-3-ref.html
 fuzzy-if(winWidget,123,1600) == 409659-1a.html 409659-1-ref.html  # Bug 1128229
 != 409659-1b.html 409659-1-ref.html
 fails-if(Android&&AndroidVersion>=15&&smallScreen&&AndroidVersion!=17) != 409659-1c.html 409659-1-ref.html #there is no difference in the visible area of the screen
-fuzzy-if(winWidget,123,1600) == 409659-1d.html 409659-1-ref.html  # Bug 1128229
+fuzzy-if(winWidget,123,1900) == 409659-1d.html 409659-1-ref.html  # Bug 1128229
 == 410621-1.html 410621-1-ref.html
 == 411059-1.html 411059-1-ref.html
 == 411334-1.xml 411334-1-ref.xml
 == 411367-1.html 411367-1-ref.html
 == 411367-2.html 411367-2-ref.html
 == 411367-3.html 411367-3-ref.html
 == 411585-1.html 411585-1-ref.html
 == 411585-2.html 411585-2-ref.html
--- a/layout/reftests/image/reftest.list
+++ b/layout/reftests/image/reftest.list
@@ -12,17 +12,17 @@ random-if(/^Windows\x20NT\x205\.1/.test(
 random-if(/^Windows\x20NT\x205\.1/.test(http.oscpu)) == sync-image-switch-1d.html sync-image-switch-1-ref.html # bug 855050 for WinXP
 
 # Tests for "object-fit" & "object-position"
 test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) == image-object-fit-dyn-1.html image-object-fit-dyn-1-ref.html
 test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) == image-object-fit-with-background-1.html image-object-fit-with-background-1-ref.html
 test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) == image-object-fit-with-background-2.html image-object-fit-with-background-2-ref.html
 test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) == image-object-position-dyn-1.html image-object-position-dyn-1-ref.html
 test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) == image-object-position-with-background-1.html image-object-position-with-background-1-ref.html
-test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) fuzzy-if(winWidget,100,198) == image-object-position-with-background-2.html image-object-position-with-background-2-ref.html  # Bug 1128229
+test-pref(layout.css.object-fit-and-position.enabled,true) fuzzy-if(winWidget,117,242) == image-object-position-with-background-2.html image-object-position-with-background-2-ref.html  # Bug 1128229
 
 # Tests for image-orientation used with 'from-image' (note that all
 # image-orientation tests are fuzzy because the JPEG images do not perfectly
 # reproduce blocks of solid color, even at maximum quality):
 fuzzy(2,5) == image-orientation-from-image.html?none     image-orientation-ref.html?0
 fuzzy(1,1) == image-orientation-from-image.html?0        image-orientation-ref.html?0
 fuzzy(1,1) == image-orientation-from-image.html?90       image-orientation-ref.html?90
 fuzzy(1,1) == image-orientation-from-image.html?180      image-orientation-ref.html?180