Bug 1564917 - Don't remove conditions we can't create in wpt-update, r=maja_zf
authorJames Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:43:23 +0000
changeset 482361 203e09f37d1f38b5f6f7de0fd8dc181a66d6daa2
parent 482360 76af8bbce61aedb0dbc30691e2a4f9dccf6018bf
child 482362 9559ef8f347dc0e4e92546954472d4153283d5f2
push id89718
push userjames@hoppipolla.co.uk
push dateThu, 11 Jul 2019 09:14:02 +0000
treeherderautoland@203e09f37d1f [default view] [failures only]
perfherder[talos] [build metrics] [platform microbench] (compared to previous push)
bugs1564917, 1545143
first release with
nightly linux32
nightly linux64
nightly mac
nightly win32
nightly win64
last release without
nightly linux32
nightly linux64
nightly mac
nightly win32
nightly win64
Bug 1564917 - Don't remove conditions we can't create in wpt-update, r=maja_zf With the changes in bug 1545143 we were accidentially deleting conditions like `if release_or_beta: FAIL` from metadata with `mach wpt-update --full` because they didn't correspond to anything in the "full" run. With this change a full update will preserve any conditions that involve variables we aren't using in the update and that also don't match any of the runs we have. The reason for the latter requirement is cases like expected: if nightly_build: PASS FAIL In this case if we preserve the condition we'll end up with the wrong behaviour for nightly; by removing it we end up with the wrong behaviour for release_or_beta, which is a problem but one that can be solved asynchronously (i.e. it doesn't block sync). In general this also means that one should prefer to write conditions that match only non-nightly builds first and have the default fallback be correct for nightly i.e. the above condition would be better expressed as: expected: if release_or_beta: FAIL or expected: if not nightly_build: FAIL Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37600
--- a/testing/web-platform/README.md
+++ b/testing/web-platform/README.md
@@ -201,16 +201,42 @@ possible to unset a value that has been 
 special token `@Reset` (usually used with prefs), or to force a value
 to true or false using `@True` and `@False`.  For example to enable
 the tests in `meta/feature/unsupported/subfeature-supported` one might
 create an ini file
 `meta/feature/unsupported/subfeature-supported/__dir__.ini` like:
     disabled: @False
+Setting Metadata for Release Branches
+Run info properties can be used to set metadata for release branches
+that differs from nightly (e.g. for when a feature depends on prefs
+that are only set on nightly), for example:
+    [filename.html]
+      expected:
+        if release_or_beta: FAIL
+Note that in general the automatic metadata update will work better if
+the nonstandard configuration is used explictly in the conditional,
+and placed at the top of the set of conditions, i.e. the following
+would cause problems later:
+    [filename.html]
+      expected:
+        if nightly_build: PASS
+        FAIL
+This is because on import the automatic metadata updates are run
+against the results of nightly builds, and we remove any existing
+conditions that match that configuration to avoid building up stale
+configuration options.
 Test Format
 Javascript tests are written using
 [testharness.js](http://github.com/w3c/testharness.js/). Reftests are
 similar to standard Gecko reftests without an explicit manifest file,
 but with in-test or filename conventions for identifying the
--- a/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/manifestupdate.py
+++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/manifestupdate.py
@@ -403,16 +403,23 @@ class PropertyUpdate(object):
                 self.node.new_disabled = True
                 msg = "Conflicting metadata values for %s" % (
                 if e.cond:
                     msg += ": %s" % serialize(e.cond).strip()
+        # If all the values match remove all conditionals
+        # This handles the case where we update a number of existing conditions and they
+        # all end up looking like the post-update default.
+        new_default = conditions[-1][1] if conditions[-1][0] is None else self.default_value
+        if all(condition[1] == new_default for condition in conditions):
+            conditions = [(None, new_default)]
         # Don't set the default to the class default
         if (conditions and
             conditions[-1][0] is None and
             conditions[-1][1] == self.default_value):
             self.node.modified = True
             conditions = conditions[:-1]
         if self.node.modified:
@@ -423,17 +430,18 @@ class PropertyUpdate(object):
     def update_conditions(self, property_tree, full_update):
         # This is complicated because the expected behaviour is complex
         # The complexity arises from the fact that there are two ways of running
         # the tool, with a full set of runs (full_update=True) or with partial metadata
         # (full_update=False). In the case of a full update things are relatively simple:
-        # * All existing conditionals are ignored
+        # * All existing conditionals are ignored, with the exception of conditionals that
+        #   depend on variables not used by the updater, which are retained as-is
         # * All created conditionals are independent of each other (i.e. order isn't
         #   important in the created conditionals)
         # In the case where we don't have a full set of runs, the expected behaviour
         # is much less clear. This is of course the common case for when a developer
         # runs the test on their own machine. In this case the assumptions above are untrue
         # * The existing conditions may be required to handle other platforms
         # * The order of the conditions may be important, since we don't know if they overlap
         #   e.g. `if os == linux and version == 18.04` overlaps with `if (os != win)`.
@@ -446,18 +454,16 @@ class PropertyUpdate(object):
         # * For each existing conditional, see if it matches any of the run info we
         #   have. In cases where it does match, record the new results
         # * Where all the new results match, update the right hand side of that
         #   conditional, otherwise remove it
         # * If this leaves nothing existing, then proceed as with the full update
         # * Otherwise add conditionals for the run_info that doesn't match any
         #   remaining conditions
         prev_default = None
-        if full_update:
-            return self._update_conditions_full(property_tree)
         current_conditions = self.node.get_conditions(self.property_name)
         # Ignore the current default value
         if current_conditions and current_conditions[-1].condition_node is None:
             self.node.modified = True
             prev_default = current_conditions[-1].value
             current_conditions = current_conditions[:-1]
@@ -479,16 +485,33 @@ class PropertyUpdate(object):
                             for (run_info, node) in run_info_index.iteritems()
                             if node.result_values}
         run_info_by_condition = self.run_info_by_condition(run_info_index,
         run_info_with_condition = set()
+        if full_update:
+            # Even for a full update we need to keep hand-written conditions not
+            # using the properties we've specified and not matching any run_info
+            top_level_props, dependent_props = self.node.root.run_info_properties
+            update_properties = set(top_level_props)
+            for item in dependent_props.itervalues():
+                update_properties |= set(dependent_props)
+            for condition in current_conditions:
+                if (not condition.variables.issubset(update_properties) and
+                    not run_info_by_condition[condition]):
+                    conditions.append((condition.condition_node,
+                                       self.from_ini_value(condition.value)))
+            new_conditions, errors = self._update_conditions_full(property_tree,
+                                                                  prev_default=prev_default)
+            conditions.extend(new_conditions)
+            return conditions, errors
         # Retain existing conditions if they match the updated values
         for condition in current_conditions:
             # All run_info that isn't handled by some previous condition
             all_run_infos_condition = run_info_by_condition[condition]
             run_infos = {item for item in all_run_infos_condition
                          if item not in run_info_with_condition}
             if not run_infos:
--- a/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/tests/test_update.py
+++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/tests/test_update.py
@@ -589,16 +589,61 @@ def test_update_full():
     assert new_manifest.get_test(test_id).children[0].get(
         "expected", run_info_1) == "FAIL"
     assert new_manifest.get_test(test_id).children[0].get(
         "expected", run_info_2) == "ERROR"
 @pytest.mark.xfail(sys.version[0] == "3",
                    reason="metadata doesn't support py3")
+def test_update_full_unknown():
+    test_id = "/path/to/test.htm"
+    tests = [("path/to/test.htm", [test_id], "testharness", """[test.htm]
+  [test1]
+    expected:
+      if release_or_beta: ERROR
+      if not debug and os == "osx": NOTRUN
+    log_0 = suite_log([("test_start", {"test": test_id}),
+                       ("test_status", {"test": test_id,
+                                        "subtest": "test1",
+                                        "status": "FAIL",
+                                        "expected": "PASS"}),
+                       ("test_end", {"test": test_id,
+                                     "status": "OK"})],
+                      run_info={"debug": False, "release_or_beta": False})
+    log_1 = suite_log([("test_start", {"test": test_id}),
+                       ("test_status", {"test": test_id,
+                                        "subtest": "test1",
+                                        "status": "FAIL",
+                                        "expected": "PASS"}),
+                       ("test_end", {"test": test_id,
+                                     "status": "OK"})],
+                      run_info={"debug": True, "release_or_beta": False})
+    updated = update(tests, log_0, log_1, full_update=True)
+    new_manifest = updated[0][1]
+    run_info_1 = default_run_info.copy()
+    run_info_1.update({"release_or_beta": False})
+    run_info_2 = default_run_info.copy()
+    run_info_2.update({"release_or_beta": True})
+    assert not new_manifest.is_empty
+    assert new_manifest.get_test(test_id).children[0].get(
+        "expected", run_info_1) == "FAIL"
+    assert new_manifest.get_test(test_id).children[0].get(
+        "expected", run_info_2) == "ERROR"
+@pytest.mark.xfail(sys.version[0] == "3",
+                   reason="metadata doesn't support py3")
 def test_update_default():
     test_id = "/path/to/test.htm"
     tests = [("path/to/test.htm", [test_id], "testharness", """[test.htm]
       if os == "mac": FAIL
--- a/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/wptmanifest/backends/conditional.py
+++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/wptmanifest/backends/conditional.py
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 import operator
-from ..node import NodeVisitor, DataNode, ConditionalNode, KeyValueNode, ListNode, ValueNode, BinaryExpressionNode
+from ..node import NodeVisitor, DataNode, ConditionalNode, KeyValueNode, ListNode, ValueNode, BinaryExpressionNode, VariableNode
 from ..parser import parse
 class ConditionalValue(object):
     def __init__(self, node, condition_func):
         self.node = node
         assert callable(condition_func)
         self.condition_func = condition_func
@@ -56,16 +56,30 @@ class ConditionalValue(object):
             value = type_func(value)
         return value
     def remove(self):
         if len(self.node.parent.children) == 1:
+    @property
+    def variables(self):
+        rv = set()
+        if self.condition_node is None:
+            return rv
+        stack = [self.condition_node]
+        while stack:
+            node = stack.pop()
+            if isinstance(node, VariableNode):
+                rv.add(node.data)
+            for child in reversed(node.children):
+                stack.append(child)
+        return rv
 class Compiler(NodeVisitor):
     def compile(self, tree, data_cls_getter=None, **kwargs):
         """Compile a raw AST into a form where conditional expressions
         are represented by ConditionalValue objects that can be evaluated
         at runtime.
         tree - The root node of the wptmanifest AST to compile